Hata wakati zinabadilisha sheria? (Doesn't matter whether they did it for a person with special needs).Watu waheshimu korti zetu na si tafadhali
How, as commission has said, there is no law that gives a pass to persons with dis-ability!But really, there was no justification to deny him his right in the first place because he's qualified.
Did he have the right number of signatures of registered voters from 24 counties as per the law?But really, there was no justification to deny him his right in the first place because he's qualified.
How, as commission has said, there is no law that gives a pass to persons with dis-ability!
It's not about disability. There's a law about data protection. Personally I can't give any candidate a copy of my ID no matter how I support them, and the court had earlier quashed this requirement.Did he have the right number of signatures of registered voters from 24 counties as per the law?
ningekushow uwache ujinga, but seeing to it that ulisomewa KATIMBA, I'll let this pass.It's not about disability. There's a law about data protection. Personally I can't give any candidate a copy of my ID no matter how I support them, and the court had earlier quashed this requirement.
Niwaganwo mjuaji, but tell me which part nakaa nlisomewaningekushow uwache ujinga, but seeing to it that ulisomewa KATIMBA, I'll let this pass.
Una confuse kesi ya Kigame na ya Aukot, Aukot ndio kesi yake ilikuwa kuhusu scanned copies za I.Ds za proposers, his case from where I sit was valid. Problem is the courts are also issuing orders too late in the gameIt's not about disability. There's a law about data protection. Personally I can't give any candidate a copy of my ID no matter how I support them, and the court had earlier quashed this requirement.
It's here
![]()
Win for Independents as court quashes demand on supporters ID
The law required independents to provide copies of supporters ID cards before clearance.www.the-star.co.ke
Then it means wafula chebukati had absolutely zero reason not to admit him. Issue ya disability inakujia wapi jameni. He was not contesting to represent the disabled, nor was he seeking special favours because he is disabledUna confuse kesi ua Kigame na ya Aukot, Aukot had a valid case
Have you read where it says that it was the court's view that Kigame had demonstrated exemplary effort in complying with the law and the 1013 signatures (out of prescribed 48000!) would suffice?Then it means wafula chebukati had absolutely zero reason not to admit him. Issue ya disability inakujia wapi jameni. He was not contesting to represent the disabled, nor was he seeking special favours because he is disabled
Aukot has called him some choice wordsThen it means wafula chebukati had absolutely zero reason not to admit him. Issue ya disability inakujia wapi jameni. He was not contesting to represent the disabled, nor was he seeking special favours because he is disabled
That is the IEBC side. Kigame says he submitted all the signatures. He says they didn't even bother to look at his documents. I hope you litsen to aukot giving a similar explanation. They simply denied him the audience to present his documentsHave you read where it says that it was the court's view that Kigame had demonstrated exemplary effort in complying with the law and the 1013 signatures (out of prescribed 48000!) would suffice?
Aukot has called him some choice words
Aukot has called him some choice words