Burner
Elder Lister
The trump team keeps showing up to court with no solid evidence but hearsay. In a nutshell..
"The assertion that Connarn was informed by an unknown individual what “other hired poll workers at her table” had been told is inadmissible hearsay within hearsay, and plaintiffs have provided no hearsay exception for either level of hearsay that would warrant consideration of the evidence. See MRE 801(c). The note— which is vague and equivocal—is likewise hearsay. "
The courts are saying, "Did you really just ask us to intervene in an election because you know a guy who heard a guy say that he heard a guy say that he heard someone committed fraud?"
"The assertion that Connarn was informed by an unknown individual what “other hired poll workers at her table” had been told is inadmissible hearsay within hearsay, and plaintiffs have provided no hearsay exception for either level of hearsay that would warrant consideration of the evidence. See MRE 801(c). The note— which is vague and equivocal—is likewise hearsay. "
The courts are saying, "Did you really just ask us to intervene in an election because you know a guy who heard a guy say that he heard a guy say that he heard someone committed fraud?"
Last edited:
