gmos mtakula by force

wrongturn

Elder Lister



IMG_20221118_083200.jpg
 
😂😂😂this guy is always a suspect in everything he does/says.
He's an advocate that we are too many, hence need to depopulate. So I agree with his agenda
 
I don't see any problem in using GMO responsibly. We have a big population and limited arable land. We need to take advantage of technology. The key thing is avoiding being slaves of big seed companies.
 
I don't see any problem in using GMO responsibly. We have a big population and limited arable land. We need to take advantage of technology. The key thing is avoiding being slaves of big seed companies.
To those fighting this move, yet having noodles, breakfast cereals and eating imported snacks on a daily basis, y'all don't know how much GMO you have already consumed.
 
To those fighting this move, yet having noodles, breakfast cereals and eating imported snacks on a daily basis, y'all don't know how much GMO you have already consumed.

I think no one is fighting gmo , question is why are developed countries running away from it. We know nabii is god given and won't want to sign up Kenyans for sudden increase in cancer cases.

And why the sudden rush to onboard Kenyans to eat knowing very well comesa regulations ,a farmer in Kenya can't export gmos to the region.
 
I think no one is fighting gmo , question is why are developed countries running away from it. We know nabii is god given and won't want to sign up Kenyans for sudden increase in cancer cases.

And why the sudden rush to onboard Kenyans to eat knowing very well comesa regulations ,a farmer in Kenya can't export gmos to the region.

You are opposed to GMO. You are implicitly claiming that it will cause an increase in cancer cases. Do you have any evidence to support this claim?

We should do what's in our best interest. We are unable to grow enough food for everyone. We don't have enough food for our livestock. Why must we copy the Europeans or anyone else? Why can't we make decisions that are backed by hard science?
 
Why must we copy the Europeans or anyone else? Why can't we make decisions that are backed by hard science?

science originated from the west, if they said you've malaria, you have it. Gmos came from them, if they're avoiding it, why should we not? why is Netherlands among the biggest producers of potatoes yet they running away from gmo? why can't we pick the best farming practices from them first?
you said we can't grow enough yet we saw farmers in nyandarua struggling to where they can take their cabbages, wengine in baringo are feeding tomatoes to cows. Why can't we sort our distribution challenges first before thinking of gmos?
 
Moses Kuria was an apt appointment. I think he is most likely going to be the top performijg CS. This GMO hullabaloo reminds of the digital migration and the way the media companies boycotted as if they have anything interesting on their channels to watch.
 
I don't see any problem in using GMO responsibly. We have a big population and limited arable land. We need to take advantage of technology. The key thing is avoiding being slaves of big seed companies.
Every beneficial thing comes with risks. Are we saying that the problem with food production in Kenya is the varieties grown?

Not poor agricultural practices, creating concrete jungles on prime agricultural land, poor food distribution, corruption and outright sabotage (dam money stolen, galana kulalu).

Will GMOs solve the latter problems?

If we can solve all other more obvious and impactful problems, and the question comes down to varieties, then we can carefully consider whether GMOs are worth the benefits at the expense of the risks. Problem is that we don't know what the risks are, and other countries have banned or are banning GMOs.

Anyway, your politicians are looking for scapegoats for the food problem, and the Gates Foundation are looking for Guinea pigs to be used as case studies in their publications.

Plus as mentioned above, US maize exporters could be looking for alternative markets for their GMO maize, just like US mitumba is dumped in kenya
 
Every beneficial thing comes with risks. Are we saying that the problem with food production in Kenya is the varieties grown?

Not poor agricultural practices, creating concrete jungles on prime agricultural land, poor food distribution, corruption and outright sabotage (dam money stolen, galana kulalu).

Will GMOs solve the latter problems?

If we can solve all other more obvious and impactful problems, and the question comes down to varieties, then we can carefully consider whether GMOs are worth the benefits at the expense of the risks. Problem is that we don't know what the risks are, and other countries have banned or are banning GMOs.

Anyway, your politicians are looking for scapegoats for the food problem, and the Gates Foundation are looking for Guinea pigs to be used as case studies in their publications.

Plus as mentioned above, US maize exporters could be looking for alternative markets for their GMO maize, just like US mitumba is dumped in kenya

There is no evidence that eating GMO is harmful to human or animal health. Why shouldn't we consider importing GMO food? Why should we let people die of hunger while.we.could feed them with GMO food?
 
There is no evidence that eating GMO is harmful to human or animal health. Why shouldn't we consider importing GMO food? Why should we let people die of hunger while.we.could feed them with GMO food?
Point is, gmo is the wrong solution to the wrong problem. If the right problem was solved we wouldn't be discussing gmo at the moment.
 
For important issues, you don't settle for absence of evidence. That's plain laziness. You look for evidence to the contrary.
You lost me there. Are you saying we should go out there and find the evidence that proves GMOs are harmful? What if they are not harmful? How can you find evidence to prove a negative thing?

People have been eating this food, na bado hawajakufa.
 
Back
Top