Trump Angered by Poor Employment Numbers

upepo

Elder Lister
1754107050480.webp

On August 1, 2025, President Donald Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), just hours after the release of a disappointing July jobs report. The report showed the U.S. economy added only 73,000 jobs for the month, well below expectations, and included major downward revisions to May and June figures—erasing about 258,000 jobs from earlier estimates. Trump accused McEntarfer of manipulating the data to politically damage Republicans and himself, calling the numbers “rigged,” although he provided no evidence to support the claim.

The firing drew immediate criticism from economists and former officials across the political spectrum, who warned that removing a statistics chief over unfavorable numbers threatens the independence and credibility of U.S. economic data. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, long regarded as a politically neutral source of labor market information, relies on routine processes to adjust earlier job figures as more complete survey responses arrive—often from small businesses and public-sector employers like school districts. Experts emphasized that the revisions in question reflected this standard methodology, not misconduct or bias.

Following McEntarfer’s removal, William Wiatrowski, the BLS deputy commissioner, was named acting head of the agency. Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer supported the president’s decision, citing concern over the unusually large revisions during McEntarfer’s tenure. Still, critics argued that the move set a dangerous precedent, undermining public trust in official statistics at a time when economic signals—including rising unemployment to 4.2% and weakness in education and manufacturing—were already causing concern.

While Trump framed the dismissal as a step toward ensuring “accurate numbers,” opponents saw it as an unprecedented politicization of a key federal statistical agency, with potentially long-lasting effects on how U.S. economic data is produced and perceived.
 
While Trump framed the dismissal as a step toward ensuring “accurate numbers,” opponents saw it as an unprecedented politicization of a key federal statistical agency, with potentially long-lasting effects on how U.S. economic data is produced and perceived.
I keep asking whether Trump is genuinely incompetent or if he’s simply shrewd. Despite missteps like the Epstein‑files saga, he consistently turns legal controversies into political gain.

Or maybe America’s constitutional framework isn’t as resilient as believed and Trump isn’t trying to break it, so much as walk right through its cracks. He’s a bull in a china‑shop.
 
I keep asking whether Trump is genuinely incompetent or if he’s simply shrewd. Despite missteps like the Epstein‑files saga, he consistently turns legal controversies into political gain.

Or maybe America’s constitutional framework isn’t as resilient as believed and Trump isn’t trying to break it, so much as walk right through its cracks. He’s a bull in a china‑shop.
Man is terribly incompetent for a president. Worse still, he has managed to recruit a support base that won't dare question him, and together they can counter-narrative and dominate anything thrown at him. Unfortunately, they cannot manipulate all realities through rhetoric; some will sting them hard. Like the China issue backfired terribly on him.

It is also beginning to appear as if the US system is not as robust as it made the world believe. Former presidents wouldn't imagine doing half of what Trump is getting away without risking impeachment. Even Clinton cannot believe he went through so much heat over the Lewinsky scandal yet Trump can get away with doing the same with minors.
 
I keep asking whether Trump is genuinely incompetent or if he’s simply shrewd. Despite missteps like the Epstein‑files saga, he consistently turns legal controversies into political gain.

Or maybe America’s constitutional framework isn’t as resilient as believed and Trump isn’t trying to break it, so much as walk right through its cracks. He’s a bull in a china‑shop.
What makes news is that Trump has fired the Commissioner. What does not make news is that the department has been producing inaccurate figures for some time now. Before the elections, they bumped the job numbers up to make the democrats look good, and then revised them down after Trump won. As the head of department, you take responsibility for shoddy work.

Trump is not naive, he knows he's being fought from many quarters, from fake charges and corrupt prosecutors and judges, to the media with fake stories and manipulated polls (which mostly predicted a Kamala win), to Intelligence officials cooking up hoaxes like the Russia collusion, to the head of the federal reserve etc.. There are many in the bureacracy still fighting him
 
Back
Top