Search results

They were sooo close 😩

Efficiency of the punishment in this particular case does not equal the right/moral thing to do.

4 years later and crowds are still chanting lock them up. Only people who got locked up were people of his campaign.

I dont think either of them are funded by the govt. By the way there several other science peer review journals that have also recently written editorials against trump. It's unprecedented because they do never weigh in on politics or policy in their publications.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientific-american-endorses-joe-biden1/ Scientific American has never endorsed a presidential candidate in its 175-year history. This year we are compelled to do so. We do not do this lightly. The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/10/08/science-journal-endorsement-trump/ In more than two centuries of publishing, the New England Journal of Medicine has never weighed in on a U.S. presidential election. That changed this week. On Wednesday, alongside its usual peer-reviewed...

I dont understand how this is any different from what i have been saying. You collect data and if it is repeatable, testable and gives consistent results it is true. Theories are refined as long as the evidence that supports or challenges them holds up to scrutiny. It is not a matter of...

Give an example please.

Because in outsourcing those responsibilities I expect some measure of reason in how violations are handled. I am very doubtful that you would take a hammer to your kid's phone if he fucks up at home. so why is it ok just because it is in school?

If there is data to back the theory and it is testable, repeatable and gives consistent results then it is considered true. How popular it is, is irrelevant. I dont know what you have said here.

Kuiba mitihani was happening long before phones were a thing so that isnt an excuse. As for the rest of your reply, those are not concerns. If you find a teenager joyriding in his father's mkebe, you don't bulldoze the car to teach him a lesson about stealing cars.

I dont have a teenage kid. Lakini bado sijasikia anybody akiongea juu ya concerns hapa. What are these concerns?

tuseme junior amekuwa good boy hii holiday and for his birthday in July you bought him simu ya a Oppo for 30k. Now he has been called back to school suddenly and against his better reasoning, he has carried the phone to school. Now the phone has been found and ndiyo hiyo inachapwa manyundo kaa...

I dont know.

No it does not. You cannot cut off his finger and you cannot punch the kid in the face. There are a set limit of actions you can take and willful destruction of property is not one of them.

Again. You claim you know that we came from somewhere else but offer no evidence but a story. Stories can be made up and usually when human cannot find a suitable explanation. And the popularity of a story does not make it more credible.

If you can supportany of your views here with evidence then lets hear it.